Showing posts with label repeal DOMA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label repeal DOMA. Show all posts

Monday, August 20, 2012

Why Out4Immigration Supports Deferred Action for DREAMers

by Amos Lim

Last week, the U.S. began offering "deferred action" for undocumented immigrants who came to this country before the age of 16 and are currently under the age of 31. This group, often referred to as DREAMers (as they were the proponents of the DREAM Act legislation that failed to pass Congress in 2010) will now be allowed to apply for "deferred action", which would mean that they can live and work in America without fear of deportation for a period of two years. Out4Immigration has always counted the DREAMers as our allies in our fight for equal immigration rights and the right for the American citizens among us to be able to sponsor our partners for green cards. Some people believe the DREAMers are getting treated better than us, but that is not the point. This is.

The immigration system in the United States is broken. Immigration has always been used politically to stop groups of people from coming in, whether it was the Chinese Exclusion Act in the late 1800s/early 1900s or the Homosexual and/or HIV Travel Ban (yes, there was once a law in this country that banned homosexuals from entering). These past  - and present - exclusionary policies result in ugly rhetoric.  And corporate media, which is frequently lazy, will repeat what is told to them without fact checking.

I'm not an immigration attorney - just someone who has been in this fight for a long time with some sense of knowledge/history; however, I welcome any attorneys to help clarify my points below.
 
THIS IS THE REALITY  

1)  The deferred action that started last week is just that. DEFERRED ACTION. It is an offshoot of the Morton Memo that came out last June and is targeted specifically at the DREAMers. It gives those who grew up here and completed their education here a chance to stay without fear of deportation for TWO YEARS. The primary reason for the administration to do this is that Congress has not acted on this bill. The DREAM Act was a bill introduced by Sen. Orrin Hatch (yes, that Orrin Hatch) and supported by Sen. John McCain and was once popular among both Democrats and Republicans; it is now out of favor with the Republicans after the last Congress was elected.

It DOES NOT give them a legal route to citizenship, it just gives them some peace for two years while hopefully Congress can pass a comprehensive immigration reform bill or the DREAM Act. It will not "clog up" the waiting period for green card applications or contribute to the current backlog.

The authorization to work that will be provided to this group is not a H1-B visa. According to the FAQ by the Immigration Policy Center (I encourage people to read it, it is very informative): 

"Can a person who is granted deferred action work legally in the U.S.?
>Yes. Under existing regulations, individuals with deferred action may receive an Employment Authorization Document (EAD). Individuals who wish to request an extension of deferred action after two years will also have to apply for a renewal of their EAD."
A job authorization is not the same as an H1-B visa. An OPT visa is a job authorization document, which lasts one year for foreigners who graduated from a U.S. college and it gets processed within 45 days (when I did it 6 years ago), so please do not confuse EAD with H1-B. H1-B is an EAD but an EAD is not a H1-B.

The deferred action is not an amnesty - it gives the DREAMers 2 more years to stay here and work here while Congress gets their act together.

What happens at the end of the two years? Who knows? The next administration might not want to renew the deferred action policy or Congress might finally get their act together and pass a bill. According to the FAQ again by IPC:
"How long does deferred action last?"
>Under the childhood arrivals initiative, deferred action will be granted for a two-year period, after which recipients may request a renewal. According to DHS, individuals will be eligible for future renewals of deferred action so long as they were under age 31 on June 15, 2012.
In contrast: the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has confirmed numerous times that LGBT couples (and the Morton Memo applies) are considered families through various requests from the media but as of this date, they have not actually put it in writing, so we are still beholden on the individual prosecutorial discretions of individual cases. The House Democrats (about 85 of them including Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi) also sent a letter to the DHS urging for a clearer language. Rather than putting this in writing, DHS instead confirmed it to journalist Chris Geidner of Buzzfeed that LGBT couples are indeed considered families and will be entitled to deferred action when it comes to deportations.

In our last petition on Change.org, we asked President Obama to do the same for same-sex binational couples: http://www.change.org/

petitions/president-of-the-
united-states-issue-a-memorandum-to-grant-immigration-rights-to-lgbt-americans

I actually delivered about 1,200 signatures on this petition to the White House's point person on Immigration, Felicia Escobar last month in Washington DC. The petition as of today has about 1,400 signatures.

Had the deferred action been applied to us and not the DREAMers, would we feel differently?  

The argument from conservatives and anti-immigration groups is to frame/depict this and everything immigration-related as "amnesty" or "stealing jobs" or "freeloaders" and we must be careful not to repeat that divisive rhetoric. Because when it comes to us, they like to frame our issue as "fraud", "marriage of convenience", "stealing jobs", "government sanctioning of a immoral lifestyle" etc. etc. etc....

One thing of note: The last time something akin to an amnesty was done was in the 1980s by a Republican president and that was probably the last time we have had any amnesty action.

2)  BACKLOGS
There are many reasons why there are backlogs.  Yes, it is about resources but at the same time it is also about quotas.

Every country has a quota. Congress sets/determines every year how many people from each country can immigrate here (that quota system has not been changed for a long time). Congress also sets the quota based on the visa that you are applying for, whether it is under Family Visa, Work Visa, Green Card based on work etc. So, even if you are approved for a green card based on work or familial relationship, you will still have to wait for your "number" to be called. There have been cases where a green card application is approved but the waiting time for the green card can be at least a decade. There have been numerous bills and numerous organizations that have urged Congress to review the country quota over the years (as it is dated and the rationale for the quota needs to be reviewed) but to no avail. There is also the problem that some countries like Singapore (where I am from) do not usually meet the quota, i.e., less people want
to move here than what was allocated for but instead of using those unused quota "openings" for other countries that need them, they simply expire.

And don't get me going about the quotas for H1-B visas...we all know that the quotas are not enough!
 
Rep. Mike Honda has introduced a bill for the last three sessions of Congress called the "Reuniting Families Act" (RFA). The bill, if passed, will do a couple of things. 1) Pass UAFA (the language of UAFA is included in the bill; (2) reduce the backlogs - the bill will transfer the "unused" visas and transfer them to other categories/countries that have met their quotas; and (3) allow for Filipino veterans who fought in WWII (yes WWII !!!) to finally get their green card and citizenship. This is just a small sampling of what the bill will do; there are many more actions.

As a point of note, during the first and only hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Immigration about UAFA held by Sen. Patrick Leahy in June 2010, there was a conservative immigration group that testified against the passage of UAFA. One of the primary reasons that they gave was that "to allow LGBT couples to immigrate will further clog the badly backlogged immigration process...we need to prevent more people coming in as opposed to letting more people come in." (I am paraphrasing of course and if you want to find footage of that hearing, I am sure you can Google it or find it on the Congressional website.)
 
3) WHY IS OUT4IMMIGRATION SUPPORTING THIS ISSUE?
The answer is pretty simple - Why not?

There are more than 40,000 same-sex binational couples affected by this issue in this country. 40,000 couples. I am not even counting those that are in exile or living apart.

Are our situations all the same? Hell no! Some of us have partners who are undocumented, some of us have partners who are here on a student visa, some of us have partners who are here on a work visa, some of us have partners who visit us once every year for 3 weeks and some of us have partners who are unable to even get a passport to leave the country they reside in to come here. Our situations are all different and there are many solutions to our problems. Until the discriminatory DOMA is repealed or UAFA is finally passed, any solution that will let my brothers and sisters in these situations find some path to remaining in the U.S. legally will be supported by O4I.

Further, as a matter of political strategy we must be mindful that we CANNOT endeavor to fight this alone. By definition, we are a relatively small group of people. We NEED the help and support of anyone and everyone. When we support inclusiveness and fairness in reforms and relief measures, we are more likely to be included. If we do NOT support inclusiveness and fairness for others, we CANNOT expect any support - in fact it would likely be denied.

Please do understand that at the end of the day, we are an all-volunteer grassroots organization. We are not the behemoth that is HRC or any other big LGBT organization that people seem to think we are. The work that you see done by O4I is the work of a few dedicated volunteers who want to see the laws changed. We will take any solution we can get to bring us closer to that change. We support UAFA, RFA, RMA (Respect for Marriage Act), DREAM Act, Inclusive CIR (Comprehensive Immigration Reform) - anything that would create momentum and move us forward and give us a solution to allow us to be with the one we love.

4) WHY IS DEFERRED ACTION AN LGBT ISSUE?
Because it is a civil rights, human rights issue. Are LGBT rights a civil rights and human rights issue? You bet they are! If you have been following the news, you would know that NOM, the National Organization for Marriage, has a strategy that they put forth a couple of years ago to divide and conquer - to pit ethnic groups against LGBT groups and to have them come out and say that marriage equality is not a civil rights issue because well, they cannot change their skin color but we can change our sexuality. And like it or not, the same strategy is still being used to separate us as opposed to uniting us. If we don't support issues that are in our favor because it is not specifically an LGBT issue, why should our allies and straight people support LGBT issues because it is not about them?

Personally for me, being documented or undocumented is a very thin line. If you are on a H1-B visa and got pink slipped tomorrow, you have 10 days to pack up and leave the country or 60 days to find a job and get another H1-B visa.  (Something like this happened to me just after 9/11.) If you have a spouse here and perhaps a kid... maybe you are fortunate to buy a house when the economy is good...what's your choice? Do you just pack up and leave or do you try to find ways to stay? Becoming undocumented means you cannot leave the U.S. at all if your parents fall ill or, God forbid, pass away. Becoming undocumented means you have to live your life in the shadows just so you can stay here to be with your husband, wife or partner or kids. Becoming undocumented means you have to stay silent and not make noise or someone might report you. It is not a life anyone would choose but the broken system (and in our case, our discriminatory laws) often force this choice.

The DREAMers however did not have a choice. Most of them were brought here by their parents or families when they were young. Most of them do not have family ties back home.I have met families where two siblings are Americans and one is undocumented. I met the Pulitzer Prize winner, Jose Antonio Vargas, who is gay and undocumented and many other DREAMers who are gay and undocumented, too. Their stories mirror our own tragic tales.

Deferred action might not be a solution for some of you, but it is a solution for some of us in this community in this struggle. This might mean that for the next two years, someone can work legally without fear and work tirelessly to change the laws for all of us. For that I celebrate the relief it provides for the short time that it does.

That said, this election is also pretty important because we need to carefully examine who are the people who are supporting our issue and who are the people who want us gone. At Out4Immigration, we are not allowed to endorse any candidates so it is important for all of you to go find information about the candidates in your district and where they stand on the issues of the repealing DOMA (Respect for Marriage Act, or RMA), the passage of UAFA, RFA, Inclusive CIR, ENDA and marriage equality.

I hope I have addressed some issues that have been percolating among some of you over the past couple of days. I just want to leave you with a quote that I saw recently that I love from Mr. Nelson Mandela:
"For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains,but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others." - Nelson Mandela.

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Historic Victory for Josh & Henry and Important July Events

JOSH AND HENRY

If you have been following the news, Henry Velandia was facing deportation even though he is married to an American, Josh Vandiver. Earlier this year, Henry's case was put on hold - yesterday, his deportation was suspended! This is an amazing breakthrough for same-sex binational couples, and all those working to repeal DOMA.


In Henry's case, after review, the Newark Immigration Court granted a motion to administratively close deportation proceedings against based on President Obama's instructions to Attorney General Holder earlier this year that Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional and should stop being defended in court. You can read more about the historic victory here:


NY Times: US Drops Deportation Proceedings Against Immigrant in Same-Sex Marriage


Stop The Deportations: Government Drops Deportation Case Against Henry Velandia



BACK-TO-BACK EVENTS IN JULY

DOUG+AND+ALEX+ONE+%25281%2529

As Pride Week comes to a close, Out4Immigration, Marriage Equality USA, GetEQUAL and Stop the Deportations Project are busy again prepping for two back-to-back events in July. If you live in the Bay Area, we hope you can come out and join us!


"United by Love, Divided by Law - How DOMA Impacts Same-Sex Binational Couples"

July 12th, 6pm - 7.30pm

San Francisco Public Library, Main Branch (Civic Center BART/MUNI)

100 Larkin St, San Francisco, CA


For the first time ever, Out4Immigration is proud to be organizing an event with the San Francisco Public Library's James Hormel LGBT Center titled "United by Love, Divided by Law - How DOMA Impacts Same-Sex Binational Couples". The event listing can be found on Facebook (you do not have to be a member of Facebook to see the details as it is a public event).


Come out and hear from Attorney Lavi Soloway (Stop The Deportations Project), Attorney Ilona Turner (National Center for Lesbian Rights), Judy Rickard (Author, Torn Apart) and listen to stories from same-sex binational couples as they discuss this very important topic!


Rally In Support of Doug & Alex

July 13th, 7.30am

120 Montgonmery Street


On July 13th, 2011 in San Francisco, Alex Benshimol and Doug Gentry, a married California couple, will face every same-sex binational couple’s worst nightmare: a deportation hearing. As anyone following this issue knows, for years there has been little hope for same-sex binational couples seeking to reside together in the US. Many are legally married like Alex and Doug, but are still treated as legal strangers in the eyes of our own government.


Out4Immigration is co-organizing this event with Marriage Equality USA (MEUSA), Stop The Deportations & GetEQUAL on July 13th, the day after the library event, in support of Doug & Alex as they head into the immigration courts for their deportation hearing.


For more information about Doug & Alex - you can read their story here: http://stopthedeportations.blogspot.com/2011/06/doug-alex-face-doma-deportation-hearing.html


Doug and Alex are also featured in our Change.org petition this week! http://www.change.org/petitions/save-doug-and-alexs-marriage-and-stop-deporting-our-spouses


Complete details and the event listing can be found on Facebook. We hope you can turn out in support of Doug and Alex as they walk into the court house for their deportation hearing!


After the historic victory of Josh and Henry yesterday, we need to keep the pressure up and ensure that no LGBT families will be broken apart because of a discriminatory federal law called DOMA!


VISIT THE O4I BLOG TO READ ABOUT OUR WORK AND ACTIONS TO END DISCRIMINATION AGAINST SAME-SEX BINATIONAL COUPLES.

Let's Keep the Pressure On: Other Actions You Can Take This Week

Online activism: Sign our weekly petitions at change.org urging Congressional and Executive Support of Equal Immigration Rights for Same-Sex Binational Couples! We got a total of 12 new co-sponsors since the bill, Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) has been introduced on April 14th .

Devote Campaign - Out4Immigration: Did you see the video about Out4Immigration's volunteers that was shot by Devote Campaign recently? Check it out here!

Stay tuned: To our Yahoo! Groups list, Facebook page or follow us on Twitter to keep up with breaking news and urgent actions. It seems something is happening to tear down the barriers same-sex binational couples face every day. Be a part of the change!

Wednesday, June 08, 2011

Cristina and Monica: Legally Married Same-Sex Binational Couple Facing Deportation


Today Freedom to Marry released a video produced in partnership with In The Life Media telling the moving story of Cristina Alcota and Monica Ojeda, who, though legally married, face deportation or separation because the so-called Defense of Marriage Act denies married same-sex couples immigration protections.

This is the reason why we need the laws in this country to change! When you are done watching the video, head over to change.org and sign all of our petitions there!

The couple are clients of attorney Lavi Soloway, who runs the DOMA Project: Stop the Deportations. Lavi has proved to be a champion for couples like Christina and Monica, and a number of Out4Immigration members have sought his advice. If you need to contact Lavi, you can do so through his website, the DOMA Project: Stop the Deportations.

Note: Cristina and Monica have appeared numerous times in the media as activists for the DOMA Project's Stop The Deportations campaign, including: CNN, New York Daily News (twice), Gay City News (twice) and NY1 Pura Politica.

Saturday, June 04, 2011

Senator Feinstein, please be a champion for ALL families!!!

by Chris Barnett

http://www.change.org/petitions/senator-feinstein-please-be-a-champion-for-all-families

Much of Out4Immigration’s efforts over the years has been focused on securing equal immigration rights for same sex binational couples. The Uniting American Families Act is bill seeks to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to add the words “and permanent partners” wherever one finds the word “spouse”. Binational couples, families, and their respective communities need to encourage members of the House and Senate to become cosponsors.

Senator Dianne Feinstein of California has repeatedly rebuffed requests by community members to cosponsor UAFA. Historically, the concerns she has stated include the contentiousness of issues related to same-sex marriage and immigration –especially voicing concerns about fraud, even though UAFA stipulates tough penalties in those instances, just as for heterosexual couples. On a larger point of immigration reform, she has expressed her preference to support comprehensive immigration reform, rather than piecemeal legislation like UAFA to deal with specific communities or issues. Out4Immigration and its supporters have taken issue with this stance of the Senator’s, believing this to be an issue more relevant to civil rights and equality than immigration—and thus an issue worthy of her support—not to mention the feeling it leaves behind, that she does not get how injurious current laws are for many Americans and their families.

Feinstein's intervention in 2009 on behalf of Shirley Tan and Jay Mercado, a California couple with two sons, is exactly the response we would hope for from her in the face of the discrimination our families face. Sadly, when it comes to every other family affected by this issue, Senator Feinstein has shown little interest in making this issue a priority, even as many lives are torn apart by it.

In a recent interview with Frontiers Magazine, Senator Feinstein spoke about the need for DOMA repeal--and as some may be aware has authored The Respect for Marriage Act to that end--yet rejected family reunification for LGBT as relevant to that effort. Considering the years in which we have been appealing to Senator Feinstein through letters, phone calls, and meetings with aides to support UAFA, we found her lack of knowledge and awareness on this issue disheartening and disturbing—and grounds for this week’s petition letter calling on her to champion this issue at last as she works to seek The Respect for Marriage Act’s passage.

By treating one group as if they should wait for their civil rights, our elected representatives perpetuate conditions that give rise to inequality in our society. Demand better! Please sign this letter, and please share and promote however you can!

http://www.change.org/petitions/senator-feinstein-please-be-a-champion-for-all-families

And the letter:

Senator, the time has come to be a champion for ALL families!

Dear Senator Feinstein,

For years, Out4Immigration has been working to secure passage of the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA, H.R. 2221 / S.1328) and, more recently, Congressman Mike Honda’s Reuniting Families Act (RFA, H.R.1796).

Over the years, members of Out4Immigration and many of your constituents have appealed to you for your signature as a co-sponsor of the UAFA. As a politician, your concerns about “contentious” bills like this one are understandable. However, your intervention on behalf of the family of Shirley Tan and Jay Mercado in 2009 inspired and gave hope to all who are touched by this issue. It affirmed for us your knowledge that many Americans face similar hardships. The fact that some Americans have a mechanism to sponsor their foreign-born spouses for legal immigration, while members of the LGBT community do not, points directly to the issue of equality.

In the course of your recent Frontiers Magazine interview, you expressed surprise on the issue of same-sex binational couples and what DOMA repeal would mean for them, asserting that this issue was “a whole different set of laws.” The fact is, immigration through family reunification IS an important federal right – one of the 1,138 federal rights legally married gay and lesbian citizens are currently denied due to DOMA. As Attorney Lavi Soloway states in Frontiers,
"The growing call for a moratorium on deportations that are tearing married same-sex binational couples apart every day in this country is not solely, or even primarily, an immigration issue, but rather an equality issue. No other civil rights issue of our time intersects with our broken immigration system in this manner.”


Senator Feinstein, we stand firmly behind you in the conviction that the Respect For Marriage Act must become law. It’s time for America to join the more than 20 other nations on the side of fairness and human rights by providing same-sex binational couples a legal way to sponsor their spouses for permanent residency, along with all the other rights afforded heterosexual married couples under federal law.

You stated in your interview that you would “look into” the binational issue. This petition is our effort to help you do that, because our families urgently need your help, and this injustice has gone too long without being set right. America’s LGBT citizens in binational relationships have been asking for your help for a long time. It is our hope that through the Respect for Marriage Act, you at last take advantage of the opportunity to become the champion our families so critically need.

Respectfully,

[Your name]

http://www.change.org/petitions/senator-feinstein-please-be-a-champion-for-all-families

Thursday, May 05, 2011

BREAKING: Attorney General Holder Vacates Immigration Decision Based on DOMA

Via Metro Weekly Poliglot by Chris Geidner.

Attorney General Eric Holder today filed a very rare decision, vacating a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals related to the application of Paul Wilson Dorman, in which the BIA applied Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act to his pending case.

Holder writes:
Pursuant to my authority set forth in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h)(1)(i), I order that the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") in this case applying Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA"), 1 U.S.C. § 7, be vacated, and that this matter be referred to me for review.
Saying the attorney general "has taken [an] extraordinary step" with the decision, attorney Eric Berndt -- the supervising attorney for the National Asylum Partnership on Sexual Minorities at the National Immigrant Justice Center -- tells Metro Weekly, "It adds some heft to our requests for prosecutorial discretion in individual cases in which the foreign partner" of a same-sex bi-national couple is seeking a green card because of his or her citizen same-sex partner.

Attorney Lavi Soloway, a co-founder of Immigration Equality, has been one of the leading attorney-advocates on the issue of asking the government -- the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security and White House -- to exercise that discretion. Soloway tells Metro Weekly in an email, "This development could be a sign that the Obama administration is looking for a way to protect gay and lesbian bi-national couples who are currently barred from the regular marriage-based immigration process by the Defense of Marriage Act. (Read more)

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Uniting American Families Act Reintroduced with Record Support

Media Contacts:
Amos Lim, Out4Immigration, 415-608-5526, amos@out4immigration.org
Kathy Drasky, Out4Immigration, 415-606-2085, kathy@out4immigration.org

Legislation and Letter from Congress Increases Demand for Protection of Same-Sex Binational Couples, Families from Discriminatory Immigration Law

Washington, DC — April 14, 2011 — The Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) was reintroduced in the House and Senate today by long-time equal rights advocates Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY-8) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT). The legislation is backed by 98 co-sponsors in the House and 18 in the Senate, a record for the bill on reintroduction. It has been introduced in every session of Congress since 2000.
The bill would add three words to existing US immigration law – “or permanent partner” – wherever the word spouse appears, facilitating the need for LGBT Americans to obtain green cards for their partners while they wait for repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

“Thousands of committed same-sex couples are needlessly suffering because of unequal treatment under our immigration laws, and this is an outrage,” said Nadler. “Our Constitution guarantees that no class of people will be singled out for differential treatment — and LGBT Americans should not and must not be excluded from that guarantee.”

Adding a one-two punch to UAFA’s reintroduction is a letter from Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA-16), the ranking Democrat on the House Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement, calling on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice to stop denying LGBT green card applications and stop separating LGBT binational families. The letter was signed by 48 House members and adds weight to a similar letter sent last week by Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) and 11 of his colleagues requesting the same immediate remedy to what Rep. Nadler has repeatedly called “gratuitous cruelty.”

UAFA comes into the 112th Congress under a much different landscape than previous introductions of the bill. While Democrats no longer control the House and hold a slimmer majority in the Senate, support for same-sex binationals has grown since President Obama’s directive on February 23 that the federal government stop defending Section 3 of DOMA on the basis that the law – which prohibits federal recognition of same-sex marriages – is unconstitutional.

No group is harder hit by DOMA than same-sex binational couples and their families, many who have been forced into exile or literally torn apart by immigration law that adheres to the DOMA decree that marriage is defined as “one man and one woman.” As a result, these couples, regardless of legal marriages, civil unions or domestic partnerships are treated as “legal strangers”.

Efforts to slow down individual deportation proceedings targeting the foreign partner in these relationships have achieved some successes of late by delaying deportations on a case by case basis, in part due to the Obama administration determination that DOMA is unconstitutional. This administration's new DOMA position caused a major uproar last month when the United States Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) seemed to suggest that it would hold green card applications filed by same-sex couples in abeyance until DOMA was repealed or struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Although USCIS reversed this decision within 36 hours, advocates for same-sex binational couples, like Out4Immigration, are petitioning USCIS, DHS, DOJ and the White House to restore the abeyance policy and implement a moratorium on deportations, urging an administrative fix until judicial and legislative actions can occur.

With advocacy engines now firing on all three branches of government – relief in some form for the heartbreak and injustice an estimated 36,000 same-sex binationals and their families incur has never seemed more possible. Out4Immigration urges more couples to come forward and tell their stories to continue to build and sustain the momentum. The all-volunteer, grassroots group can be contacted at info@out4immigration.org.

# # #
______________
For more information:
Uniting American Families Act Reintroduced in Congress: http:www.thetaskforce.org/press/releases/pr_uafa_041411
Gay Immigration Battle Heats Up: http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/04/14/Gay_Immigration_Battle_Heats_Up/
Dear USCIS: Don’t Go Back to Denying Green Cards to Loving, Same-Sex Couples: http://www.change.org/petitions/dear-uscis-dont-go-back-to-denying-green-cards-to-loving-same-sex-couples#?opt_new=t&opt_fb=t
Senators Kerry, Leahy, 10 Others Ask DOJ, DHS to Hold Same-Sex Binational Couples’ Immigration Petitions: http://www.metroweekly.com/poliglot/2011/04/senators-kerry-leahy-10-others.html
Gay Immigrant Couples’ Future Remains Uncertain after Judge Postpones Deportation Hearing: http://news.feetintwoworlds.org/2011/04/04/future-for-gay-immigrant-couple-remains-uncertain-following-judges-postponement-of-deportation-hearing/

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Married Couple's Status [Temporarily] Recognized by Immigration Officials

by Kathy Drasky

Yesterday's ruling by a New York immigration judge to delay the deportation of an Argentinian woman married to an American woman truly raises the bar in our fight for equal immigration rights.

While Out4Immigration stops short of calling this ruling "historic", it is probably safe to say it is a "game changer."

According to the Daily News (a mainstream New York tabloid), the judge delayed her decision until December, when she will review the case of Monica Alcota (right) from Argentina, who legally married US citizen Cristina Ojeda (left) in Connecticut. If the couple were heterosexual, they would have been able to file an I-130 form immediately after their marriage and Monica would be on the path to citizenship by now. But, because the US federal government does not recognize same-sex marriages, the couple was about to be torn apart.

Based on February's decision by President Obama and US Justice Department to stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the judge in this case, Terry Bain, "put a hold on Alcota's deportation order while the couple waits to see if DOMA is overturned and their green card application goes through."

Represented by Lavi Soloway, of Masliah & Soloway, the leading firm in same-sex binational couple immigration cases, it was argued that "removal proceedings should be terminated consistent with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s long-standing policy of prosecutorial discretion which favors family unification and the accommodation of sympathetic humanitarian circumstances. ICE and the Court should consider the rapidly changing landscape of DOMA. That changing landscape includes the Obama Administration’s new position on DOMA which is expected to dramatically alter the course of future litigation against DOMA."

Out4Immigration cautions that regardless of being married, in a civil union or domestic partnership, no same-sex binational couple should attempt to file I-130 petitions or any other documents without the advice of a competent immigration attorney. We refer you to Masliah & Soloway's Stop the Deportation Project. No one should knowingly overstay a visa. If you are in jeopardy of this, we urge you to immediately get legal advice.

We are on the path to getting equal immigration rights with legislation like the Respect for Marriage Act which will end DOMA, and the eventual reintroduction of the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) which can be our temporary fix adding the words "or permanent partner" to immigration law until we can federally be known as "spouses". We also have a chance at administrative adjustments to immigration law that may result from more cases like Monica and Cristina's.

What can you do to bring change about faster? Tell your story! There are many ways to do this. Almost every day we post news and information about how same-sex binational couples are stepping up and taking action on the Out4Immigration Facebook page. Join us there - and get involved!

Friday, March 11, 2011

View from the UK: Same-Sex Binational Couple Living in Exile Speaks Out

Guest post by Graham Adams

The United States is failing its most vulnerable citizens in the most appalling and barbaric way thanks to prejudice and discrimination shielded behind the guise of law.

The United States prides itself on being the world leader, yet is falling far behind many other countries in its stance on civil liberties and equal rights for all its citizens. How can this be in 2011?

In a country that has seen its fair share of discrimination, how can the US Government sit back and do nothing for the citizens who are crying out for help?

I have been with my partner for thirteen years, but six years ago we were forced to take a self- imposed exile from the United States on the basis that we are both male and because our loving relationship, not unlike millions of other Americans, is not recognised by the Federal Government and deemed unworthy of immigration rights.

Like many thousands of other same-sex binational couples living in constant fear of separation, the stress can become so overwhelming that it actually leads to illness, both physically and psychologically.

Rather than face the agonizing outcome of deportation due to me not being an American citizen, we decided to take charge of the inevitable outcome to our lives and leave the US shores for my homeland which recognises same-sex relationships for immigration purposes.

My partner is a US citizen. He was born in the US and spent over thirty years of his life there. He was forced to leave everything he had known and loved to move to a country he had never even visited. His family have been torn apart by this but understand his reasons. Emigration is a choice. Deportation is not!

Many thousands of families across the United States are forced to say farewell to their children, siblings and parents due to current discriminatory laws that prevent GLBT US citizens from sponsoring their same-sex partners to stay with them and become US citizens. Tearing loving families apart in such a barbaric, heartless way is perhaps one of the cruelest things imaginable.

We are now legally married in the United Kingdom, albeit called a Civil Partnership. We do not want, or expect special privileges in the United States. We simply wish to receive the same legal privileges as any other married couple in the US where one of the two is a foreign national.

My partner misses his home and his family greatly. We both terribly miss the lives we had in the United States, yet we are forced to remain in exile. My partner’s stepfather is terminally ill. His mother underwent open heart surgery a few years ago. What child wouldn’t want to be with his parents at a time like this?

Thousands of same-sex binational couples are being torn apart by unjust immigration laws each and every year. Many more thousands live in fear of being discovered by the authorities and are reluctant to come forward to share their stories and try to get the current DOMA law struck down, or legislation like the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) passed.

DOMA and unequal immigration rights do not only affect same-sex couples. They affect the families of those individuals. Would anyone want this heartbreak forced upon their children? Would anyone want to see their children flee to another country just to be with the person they have devoted their lives to?

DOMA is unconstitutional. It is barbaric, cruel and discriminatory, yet it remains in place. President Obama and the Justice Department have declared they will not support it. The time has come to stop denying law-abiding US citizens the same legal privileges and protections based solely on their sexual orientation.

Something needs to be done to remedy the discriminatory legal flaw that prohibits gay and lesbian US citizens from sponsoring partners who were born in another country. It can be done quickly with a simple adjustment to US immigration law through UAFA - adding the three words "or permanent partner" wherever the word "spouse" appears as a temporary measure. And, then it can be done permanently with DOMA repeal. However it is accomplished it needs to be done now - as each day could very well be the last day in America for a gay or lesbian US citizen with a foreign partner.

Photo: Graham and Nick enjoy all the protections and privileges of marriage in the UK, where they have entered into a Civil Union. Courtesy of the author.

Monday, February 28, 2011

Same-Sex Binationals Encouraged to Seek Legal Advice Regarding DOMA Challenges

Guest post by Lavi Soloway, Stop the Deportations, the DOMA Project, immigration attorney with the law firm Masliah and Soloway

Since the Obama Administration instructed the Justice Department to stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in court last week, we have been contacted by many same-sex binational couples who have sought to bring cases, file I-130 petitions or otherwise take up a DOMA-related challenge in the immigration context.

First Seek Expert Legal Advice
It is extremely important that no couple make any move without obtaining expert legal advice. There are significant, negative consequences, some potential and some assured, for any couple that starts down this path. There is a reason most of the couples in our Stop the Deportations, the DOMA Project were already in deportation proceedings when we filed I-130 petitions on their behalf (i.e., those who were already facing deportation had no risk of endangering their status further by making these arguments). Making a wrong move now could cause irreversible legal problems for a binational couple even if DOMA is struck down or repealed, and even if the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) is passed into law. Every couple considering their next move should be aware of the negative consequences that will result if they press forward and should be strongly discouraged by competent attorneys from taking any cavalier or risky steps at this time.

While many couples have sat on the sidelines and decided not to marry out of an abundance of caution (often those couples could have married without fear of negative consequences, but again should be consulting attorneys for individualized legal analysis on the issue), the same cannot be said for filing petitions with immigration. Once petitions are filed, a legal process will have begun that in many cases will have permanent consequences. For that reason, we urge all members of the binational couple community to look at the new landscape, assess opportunities and the strategic advantages it presents and obtain individualized legal advice.

One of the most important things we can do now is support the repeal of DOMA in the House and Senate. When those bills are introduced by Sen. Feinstein and Rep. Nadler we should energetically support their passage.


Some More Explanation on What Is to Come
One point that is often overlooked regardless of whether a same-sex binational couple is married or unmarried, is that the demise of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) will be of spectacular importance the next day because it will open up the door to fiancée visa petitions for those who are separated or exiled. (Stop the Deportations, the DOMA Project currently has one fiancée visa petition pending).

The day DOMA is no longer law, a lesbian American citizen living in Florida will be able to file a K-1 fiancée visa petition for her same-sex Kenyan partner as long as they note in the petition their intention to marry in a US jurisdiction that recognizes and performs same-sex marriages. It will not be particularly relevant where the parties live (except as a practical matter that it may require some logistical planning and travel expense).

Also, if DOMA is struck down by the US Supreme Court as violative of the US Constitution, laws and state constitutional amendments (the so-called mini-DOMAs) excluding same-sex couples from marriage in 45 states will also likely become a thing of the past. When DOMA is relegated to the dustbin of history, there will be an immediate and overwhelming victory for all binational couples. That doesn't mean we will not still have our work cut out for us, but we will forever change the landscape of this issue and effectively end the deportations, separations and exile of binational couples in almost all cases overnight.

Stop the Deportations, The DOMA Project is a pro bono project of our law firm (Masliah & Soloway). Our firm is run by two gay immigration lawyers with a combined 50+ years of experience in immigration law, specifically LGBT-focused immigration law. We are founders of Immigration Equality, we helped write Permanent Partners Immigration Act/Uniting American Families Act. Our involvement in the Marriage Equality movement is similarly of long duration reaching back to the early 1990s when Noemi Masliah was the Chair of the Board of Lambda Legal Defense and I worked with Lambda's attorney, Evan Wolfson, to campaign against DOMA during the period that the Hawaii marriage case was in full swing.

Our project is challenging DOMA in the immigration context with about 12 couples so far; these challenges are mostly in immigration court, though two cases are from outside the US (one married couple exiled in Canada, the second fiancée visa petition for a couple exiled in the UK). For more information visit our website or write to us at stopthedeportations@gmail.com.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Now that DADT Is Gone, Same-Sex Binational Couples Need to Focus on Full Federal Equal Rights

by Kathy Drasky

With President Obama’s signature on the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” this morning, 2010 ends on a high note for gay rights. With the defeat of the DREAM Act in the Senate last week, the year ends on a low note for comprehensive immigration reform (CIR).

Same-sex binational couples have long been caught in the vortex of these two important movements in American politics. We are, first and foremost, gay and lesbian, yet at least half of us are first-generation immigrants. The other half of us though are American citizens and US permanent residents. The citizens among us (second-class LGBT citizens that we are) are denied thousands of rights – including the right to sponsor our same-sex foreign-born partner for immigration purposes.

As far as political movements go, same-sex binational couples are a small group. In spite of efforts to estimate that there are far more of us than 36,000 couples – 36,000 remains the accepted figure. Split that in half and you have 18,000 gay and lesbian American citizens at any one time facing the unconscionable – leave the country you love to be with the person you love, or live a life apart from your life partner – which is no kind of life at all. (By contrast, it’s estimated that 2 million children of undocumented workers would have benefited from the DREAM Act.)

With the momentum shift that’s occurred with DADT repeal, it’s time for same-sex binationals to remember why we are being discriminated against in the first place. It is not because half of us are immigrants. It is because all of us are gay and lesbian. US immigration has no problem with opposite-sex binational couples. In fact, it is the heterosexual American citizen’s inalienable right to marry the person he or she loves and build a life with that person in the United States – whether that person is another American, or from another country.

The repeal of DOMA, then, is more in keeping us on a direct path to keep our families together rather than being tossed about in CIR (one bill we’re in, one bill we’re not; lots of groups support our inclusion; lots don’t). Meanwhile, the LGBT community, the one we all belong to, needs the stories of same-sex binational couples to underscore the case for full federal equal rights. Reasonable heterosexual Americans (some of them even reasonable Republican heterosexual Americans) will get the gist of why we need full federal equal rights a lot faster when they become aware that Americans – just like them, except for that pesky sexuality part – are being forced to leave their own country. Gays and lesbians can fight and die for our country, but we can’t truly live happily ever after in it!? Hey, you just got my dang attention!

For those who say CIR will come before DOMA repeal, I refer you to the very recent history of DADT and the DREAM Act. For those who say we need to get the LGBT community to support CIR, I say, we need to keep the LGBT community laser-focused and in step with the momentum of DADT repeal and seize the day for full federal equal rights, because that day is now.

For those that say the wait for DOMA repeal (or full federal rights under the label “civil unions”) will be too long to keep them together, legally, in the US, I say put your energy into getting the President to sign an Executive Order that will stop the deportation of any foreign person in a same-sex binational relationship who has registered and documented their relationship to the fullest extent allowed in the city or state where they live (or has been legally married in another country). Just today, after signing the repeal of DADT, when President Obama was asked about DOMA, he said, in the context of how same-sex couples are now allowed hospital visitation rights equally in all 50 states, “There are a lot of things we can do administratively even if we don’t pass things legislatively.”

For those who say, “What about the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA)?”, the bill that would add three words to existing immigration law “or permanent partner” wherever the word spouse appears, the immigration bill that actually had more co-sponsors in the House than the DREAM Act, I say we need to petition our supporters Rep. Jerrold Nadler and Sen. Patrick Leahy to re-introduce this bill in the 112th Congress immediately. While its standalone success cannot be counted on, especially with a less friendly House than the one that passed the DREAM Act and a less friendly Senate than the one that defeated it – UAFA can be the new rallying call to keep full federal equal rights front and center.