Showing posts with label CIR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CIR. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Same-Sex Binationals Left Out of Immigration Bill

Last night, many of us watched the Senate Judiciary hearings on immigration reform with a heavy heart ...


Leahy 2Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) was forced to withhold critical amendments that would have added protections for same-sex binational couples due to lack of support from his own party.

We needed all the Democrats on the committee to support these amendments. Unfortunately, Senators Schumer, Feinstein, Durbin and Franken sided with eight Republicans to ensure that the immigration bill moving forward is not inclusive, is not comprehensive and will discriminate against legally married gay and lesbian Americans with foreign spouses.

The Democrats who sided with the Republicans - Schumer, Feinstein, Durbin and Franken have betrayed the very LGBT constituencies who have supported them throughout their political careers. It is questionable whether any of them would be in power today without our votes. Each of these leaders talks about marriage equality and ending discrimination against gay and lesbian Americans, but last night, when they had the chance to show they meant what they said, they failed the LGBT community and all Americans who believe in equality and fairness.

We thank Senator Leahy for his courage in this uphill battle against bigotry and politicians like the Senators named above, along with Senators Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio, Jeff Flake and John McCain, who insisted that the inclusion of mere 36,000 people would derail a bill that offers so much hope to more than 11 million.

Please take a minute to thank Senator Leahy for being a true hero and for having the courage of his convictions.
Call or tweet him today at 202-224-4242; Twitter: @SenatorLeahy

We also thank our allies in the LGBT, faith and immigrant rights' communities who have stood with us over the years, and especially during this fight for our inclusion in the bill. We could not have brought our issue so far, so fast without your help.

The question, of course, on all our minds is - what next?

We are heartened, empowered and emboldened by these images that collectively sum up our work over the years - and we will continue to look to them for strength in the coming weeks.

Just last week, a small army of our volunteers here in the San Francisco Bay Area came to San Francisco City Hall to tell their stories of how immigration discrimination and marriage inequality has impacted their lives. We then rushed downtown to Senator Feinstein's office to hand deliver a petition with more than 6,000 signatures urging her to support the Leahy amendments.



IMG_0420

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” – Margaret Mead



Since the beginning of Out4Immigration, we have urged couples to tell their stories. We have collected hundreds of stories over the years. In the last few weeks we have been circulating these 24 stories we have collected since President Obama promised us in Las Vegas in January that we would be part of immigration reform. Each story we collect has a photo. For every image there is another harrowing tale of discrimination, denial, financial hardship, career loss, separation, exile and decisions no American should have to make. And, yet each story is filled the remarkable love of two people who remain committed to one another against all odds. Each story hangs onto what each couple has left of hope that we will soon live in a world where equality trumps bigotry and hate.


 Cute couple

“I know that you cannot live on hope alone, but without it, life is not worth living."
- Harvey Milk.

Two years ago, a group of us worked with Brynn Gelbard and the DeVote Campaign to make a video talking about the lack of immigration rights and DOMA. This was shortly after President Obama had declared DOMA unconstitutional, but before he had announced his support of marriage equality. It was at a time when same-sex marriages were only legal in a handful of states and same-sex binational couples were often told not to get married because it could jeopardize our immigration status. While we still wait for justice, much has happened in our favor in the past two years.

Of most significance: At the time this video was shot, just one couple was legally married. Today – everyone you see in this video is legally married and ready to take part in equal immigration rights, whether they come from our legislative, executive and/or judicial branch of government.

devote campaign thumnail 2

“The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall
never die.” - Sen. Edward Kennedy.


What next for same-sex binationals? We want to hear from you. Email us at info@out4immigration.org with your suggestions.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Don't Just ASK for CHANGE - DEMAND IT!



ALERT: All same-sex binational couples and allies. We need you to take to your phones, email and social media accounts and make sure every Senator who is debating our inclusion in immigration reform be made aware that we are not asking them to consider including us. We are DEMANDING it.

Talking points:

  •  Immigration reform is NOT comprehensive unless ALL families are included. That means LGBT families, specifically, same-sex binational couples.
  • Including same-sex binationals in immigration reform IS NOT redefining marriage. Same-sex marriage is LEGAL in 12 states, the District of Columbia and 15 countries.
  • Adding some 36,000 same-sex binationals to immigration reform WILL NOT kill the bill. What will kill this bill is hate and bigotry. 

Pick up your phones, fire up your email, stoke your social media and contact the following – not once, but as often as you can. If you are using Twitter, tag your tweets #binatlgbt

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Phone: 202-224-3841 (DC)
310-914-7300 (Los Angeles office)
415-393-0707 (San Francisco office)
Twitter: @SenFeinsetin
Additional phone numbers, email and snail mail contact: http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/
 
Key message: Sen. Feinstein insists that she is a champion for gays and lesbians. To her credit she did not vote for the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and supports the repeal of that law. However, she insists that same-sex binational couples be legally married before we can be included in immigration reform. Same-sex marriage, though, is currently AGAINST the law in Sen. Feinstein’s own state! Senator Feinstein has often linked her gay rights cred to being the one who found Harvey Milk’s body after he was assassinated at San Francisco City Hall in 1978. We ask the Senator, “What would Harvey do?” for same-sex binationals if he were still alive? We think he’d be taking a leadership position – and that’s what we want Senator Feinstein to do.

Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY)
Phone:  202-224-6542 (DC)
212-486-4430 (NY)
Twitter: @ChuckSchumer
Additional phone numbers, email and snail mail contact: http://www.schumer.senate.gov/

Key message: Sen. Schumer, another long-time champion for LGBT rights, is waffling on supporting our inclusion in immigration reform. In fact, he is so troubled about letting down his Republican cohorts in the Gang of 8, he claims to be LOSING SLEEP over his vote about whether or not to include us! Our message to him, via Twitter has been:  Losing sleep over gays in #CIR? @ChuckSchumer 40,000 same-sex binationals don't sleep well either. Vote yes on Leahy amendments. #binatLGBT

Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
Phone: 202-224-4242
Twitter: @SenatorLeahy
Additional phone numbers, email and snail mail contact: http://www.leahy.senate.gov/

Key message: Sen. Leahy has introduced two amendments to the immigration reform bill currently being debated. Amendments 6 and 7 call for including language from the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) and recognizing same-sex binational couples who are legally married for immigration purposes. We need all 10 Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee to vote YES on these amendments. Thank Senator Leahy for including us. Encourage his colleagues to vote YES on the Leahy amendments – or YES on amendments 6 and 7 in CIR.

Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Phone: 202-224-2152
Twitter: @SenatorDurbin
Additional phone numbers, email and snail mail contact: http://www.durbin.senate.gov/public/

Key message: Sen. Durbin says he supports LGBT rights and marriage equality. If that’s the case, then voting YES on the Leahy amendments to include same-sex binationals in immigration reform should be a matter of course.

Other Democratic Senators on the Judiciary committee include:

Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) Twitter: @SenWhitehouse / Add’l contact info: http://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/  

Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) Twitter: @amyklobuchar / Add’l contact info: http://www.klobuchar.senate.gov/

Al Franken (D-MN) Twitter: @alfranken / Add’l contact info: http://www.franken.senate.gov/

Chris Coons (D-DE) Twitter: @SenCoonsOffice / Add’l contact info: http://www.coons.senate.gov/


Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) Twitter: @SenBlumenthal  / Add’l contact info: https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/



Note: These five Senators all come from MARRIAGE EQUALITY states. They are representatives of thousands of married gay and lesbian couples, and of course, same-sex binational couples.

The final Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee is Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI). While she is not from a marriage equality state, she does support marriage equality. Twitter: @maziehirono / Add’l contact info:  http://www.hirono.senate.gov/

Key message to all of the above: Please vote YES on Senator Leahy’s amendments 6 and 7 to the immigration reform bill. Immigration reform is NOT comprehensive unless it includes ALL families. Same-sex binational couples NEED your support. 

And – if you are tweeting this, tag your tweets #binatlgbt

The Republicans – While we do not have much hope for getting YES votes out of any on the Judiciary committee, we are TIRED of their demeaning talk and their blustering that our inclusion will kill the bill. That is the message THEY are sending out to the American public and we NEED to turn it back on them.

Same-sex binationals WILL NOT kill immigration reform. Hate and bigotry will. 

And Senators Graham and Flake, two members of the Gang of 8 who are on the Judiciary committee need to hear from YOU.

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
Phone:  202-224-5972 (DC)
Twitter: @GrahamBlog
Additional phone numbers, email and snail mail contact: http://www.lgraham.senate.gov/public/

Key message: Sen. Graham is the one leading the charge against us, saying that our inclusion in the bill will derail it. He accuses those who want to add same-sex binationals to the bill as “redefining marriage”. Funny, coming from a guy who has never been married! Be respectful, though. Tell Senator Graham to STOP redefining COMPREHENSIVE. STOP demeaning our families. DO the RIGHT thing and include ALL FAMILIES in immigration reform. And – as a long shot, remind him that we are talking about denying tax-paying AMERICAN CITIZENS the right to live in their own country.

Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ)
Phone: 202-224-4521 (DC)
602-840-1891 (AZ)
Twitter:  @JeffFlake
Additional phone numbers, email and snail mail contact: http://www.flake.senate.gov/public/

Key message: As a member of the Gang of 8, along with his cohort Sen. Lindsey Graham, Sen. Flake has committed to keeping us OUT of immigration reform. Tell him his bill is NOT comprehensive if it does not include ALL families. Remind him that by not includeing same-sex binationals in immigration reform he is DENYING tax-paying AMERICAN CITIZENS the right to live in their own country.

Remember, you DO NOT have to live in these jurisdictions to contact these Senators. Although their staff may tell you differently, be POLITE, but FIRM. 

YOUR FAMILY hangs in the balance of the votes these lawmakers are about to cast. If you cannot get through on the PHONE or EMAIL, taking to Twitter or sending a letter via snail mail is just as good. In fact, in some cases it may turn out to be even more POWERFUL.

Thanks to our social media savvy volunteers who continue to post VITAL contact information. This document could not have been put together so quickly without your contributions.

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Out4Immigration Joins National Day of Action for Comprehensive Immigration Reform in San Francisco

by Amos Lim

The San Francisco Bay Coalition for Immigrant Justice organized a day of action to coincide with the National Day of Action for Comprehensive Immigration Reform. About 1000 people showed up in front of Senator Dianne Feinstein's San Francisco office at One Post Street to march to the Federal Building in the Civic Center for a rally.

Before the march started, a small group of people went into Sen. Feinstein's office for a meeting to urge her to be a champion for Comprehensive Immigration Reform that is humane and LGBT-inclusive. That group included two of our volunteers Kathy Drasky and Viki Forrest who represented same-sex binational couples.

Before the march started, Out4Immigration distributed rainbow flags and stickers, which were very popular. As we marched down Market Street, it was wonderful to see our rainbow flags flying high in the crowd.

It was also really great to see signs in Chinese advocating for an LGBT-inclusive immigration reform and advocating for LGBT families! Here are some photos from the march. Be sure to scroll all the way to the end to see the speech by our volunteer Gina Caprio. It is amazing!



Many thanks goes to Chinese for Affirmative Action, Asian Law Caucus, and ASPIRE (API DREAMers) for producing the signs in Mandarin that said "Immigration Reform Must Includes Same-Sex Couples".

Many thanks also go to Kathy and Viki for attending the meeting with Sen. Feinstein's office, Gina for speaking at the rally and Erik Schnabel for being the lead in the organizing team for the day's event.

In spite of hearing reports that we will be left out of the Senate's CIR bill, let's not give up just yet. We have many allies, supporters and friends that have our backs. Call your Senators at (202) 224-3121. It doesn't matter if they are part of the Senate's Gang of 8 or not. All Senators who have constituents that are in same-sex binational relationships - or know someone who is part of an LGBT-immigrant family - need to hear from us!

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Sinking and Swimming: Immigration Reform and Marriage Equality

by Kathy Drasky

Today is a National Day of Action to support Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Rallies and events may have already started in your part of the country, and for that I apologize for not posting this a little sooner (although all of us volunteers at Out4Immigration have been doing our best to get the word out over the last few weeks.)

Like a lot of you, I've been a little taken aback (well, that's being polite) about hearing that after all the years - all the blood, sweat and tears - same-sex binational couples are probably going to be left out of the historic Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR) bill.

I was hoping that today would be more of a celebration. That marching with our allies in the immigrant rights' community - I'm not aware of any here in San Francisco that want us left out of this legislation - would be more like a walk in the park. After all, our cases against the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) have been made in front of the Supreme Court, and we have less than 80 days to go until we know if that will fall. If it does - it pretty much renders the work we've been doing to get same-sex binationals and the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) into CIR at moot point. We won't be needing a bill that gives us just one right. We will have equality that gives us 1,138 rights. We will at last have the right to sponsor our partners for green cards.

But DOMA's demise is not a done deal. Anything can happen in the next 80 days - and one thing we should make sure of is that we call those 54 Senators who say they support marriage equality and demand they step up on our inclusion into CIR. Why? Because if they think so highly of us getting 1,138 rights, why are they not demanding that we'll be insured the one that will stop the endless gratuitous cruelty same-sex binationals live and breathe: the fear that our partner could be taken away from us and deported; the bewildering navigation of an immigration system that refuses to acknowledge we exist; the Sophie's Choice of being forced to pick either your partner or your country.

Does your Senator support Marriage Equality? Click here.

Now call 202-224-3121 and ask to speak to your Senator and demand he/she stand up for that claim by making sure same-sex binationals and UAFA are included in CIR. 

I didn't post this sooner because I was publishing the rest of this piece over at OpenSalon. You can click here to read how I feel personally about our exclusion from CIR - and the precarious position we same-sex binationals occupy between immigration reform and marriage equality. It's what I had to get my head around before making a visit this afternoon to one of my senator's local offices on behalf of O4I and today's National Day of Action for Immigration Rights.

Senator Feinstein supports Marriage Equality. I'll be asking (again) for her to make the connection from that broad approach to the more narrow. Because where will be at the end of June if the Supreme Court upholds DOMA and it remains the law of the land?

Friday, December 07, 2012

Our Story: Eleanor and Fumiko

American Grandmother Forced to Live in Exile in Canada While Supreme Court Considers Same-Sex Marriage Case

Fumiko and I met in New York way back in 1986. At the time, I was a 46 year old American woman working as a computer programmer, while Fumiko was a 37 year old Japanese woman studying as a weaver. Fumiko had planned to be in New York for just six months, on her way to Guatemala in order to study indigenous weaving techniques there. Unbeknownst to us when we were introduced by a mutual friend, our lives would soon become much more complicated.

Just a few weeks after we met, Fumiko was scheduled to head to Guatemala, and we decided to go on that trip together — the beginning of our now 26-year relationship. After a series of travels to Guatemala, then Mexico, then Japan, and then back to New York, we settled temporarily in the Big Apple to see if we could make this new relationship work.
We soon discovered what all binational same-sex couples discover — that U.S. law is by no means hospitable to couples like us, refusing to allow Americans to sponsor their same-sex partner for immigration purposes. Eight years into our relationship, Fumiko was forced to return to Japan with no clear avenue to ever return to the U.S. and to our life together. Years of short-term trips, tourist visas, student visas, tears of despair, and glimmers of hope eventually led us back to New York.

For three years, we did everything we could to be together — to get around unjust laws, to buy ourselves more time together, to try everything we could imagine a way that we could continue to share the life we had built together. Faced with an expired visa, Fumiko eventually had to return again to Japan alone, as I remained in New York, forlorn.

Fortunately, we discovered that we could live together in Canada with a bit more ease, as Canada welcomes same-sex immigrant couples. We began preparing their applications in early 2005 and were approved in 2007. We made arrangements to wind down our respective lives in Japan and New York in order to build — again — a new life together. We have lived together in Canada for five years as permanent residents — it’s certainly not a perfect situation as we’re both separated from our families, but it’s the only option we have until the United States becomes more hospitable to binational same-sex couples.

I return to New York and Boston often to check in on my grown children and, now, grandchildren. Fumiko returns to Japan every few years, as well, but is happy to return “home” each time. Last August, we married in Massachusetts.

The amount of time, money, and anxiety that U.S. immigration and marriage laws have cost us in enormous. We have been separated many times, adding unnecessary stress to our lives and to the lives of our family. It seems unjust that we have had to make such hard choices and such immense sacrifices simply to be together — and we look forward to the day that the United States finally lives up to the values articulated in the U.S. Constitution. We know that the U.S. is better than its laws — and we’re looking to the Supreme Court now to solve the problems that we and so many other binational same-sex couples must navigate each day for the sake of love.

Are you a same sex binational couple?  Do you have families / friends affected by this issue?  Please contact us at http://bit.ly/O4ICountMeIn if you are interested in sharing your story.

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Our Story: Susan and Julie


Daughter of U.S. Army Veteran Calls on Congress for Help
Binational Same-Sex Couples to Congress: “Enact LGBT-Inclusive Immigration Reform!”

The United States recently celebrated Thanksgiving and, while I am giving thanks for many things, one of my greatest sorrows during this holiday season is that my loving partner, Julie, was not with me to celebrate this greatest of American family holidays. Julie is my family – my chosen family. But our laws in the U.S. dictate that, even though we could legally marry in New York State, I am unable to sponsor her for immigration as my spouse.

It may seem rather cheesy to say we “met online” but, with technology as it is today, when a mutual friend introduced us to each other via email, we found we had a lot in common and became friends. We were email friends for two years before I met Julie in person during a business trip to Australia. And in that meeting, we confirmed that daily emails and weekly Skype visits had led us to more than simply friendship. We knew it would be hard – being a bi-national couple is hard on so many fronts – but being a same-sex couple, when neither of our countries recognized us as a couple, was a harsh reality that confronted us immediately.

I lived in Hong Kong at the time we met. When I retired in 2011, we were finally able to live together full time. We share homes in both Australia and the United States, but after a grilling at the Chicago airport earlier in 2012, we realized that Julie needed to be careful.

It’s been hard over the last several months. Both of my parents have had surgery, and I have become a primary supporter. Julie was trained as a nurse but, because we fear she might be barred at immigration, we decided that only I would come back to the U.S. to help them. My parents love and trust her, and it would benefit them for her to be able to be here. I would also benefit from her support.

I’ll be honest. I’m one of the lucky ones. Australia changed its laws in 2009 by defining a “de facto” couple as two people (opposite- or same-gender) who have a genuine, exclusive relationship, but who are not married. Australia has granted me permanent residency as a “de facto” partner. Julie and I went through a process that would be analogous to the US process for sponsoring a spouse for immigration. We proved that our relationship was genuine through a 5-inch stack of paper detailing the mingling of our finances, our daily Skype logs, our email presence, sworn support letters from her family of origin and my business colleagues, police checks (three different countries for me!), and a medical exam. I was granted a two-year temporary residency visa that allowed me to enter and leave Australia at will. Last August, that temporary visa was replaced with a Permanent Resident visa – the equivalent of a U.S. Green Card. I can live, work and pay taxes in Australia. The Australian government recognizes me as part of a couple.

Friends have asked us, “Why don’t you just live in Australia?” We could do that. But we have lives in both countries, and we have family in both countries. We have elderly parents in both countries. We have homes in both countries. If Australia recognizes us, why can’t the United States? Why must we choose one country over the other? Why should I essentially have to live in exile to be with my partner full-time?

My U.S. citizenship is very important to me. I was not born in the U.S. I am a naturalized U.S. citizen, as my father was serving in the United States Army in Germany when I was born. Even though I was born to U.S. citizens, I am not a “natural-born” US citizen. After all that my parents went through for our family and for our country, it’s very hard to be told that my relationship, my family, is not worthy to be in the United States.

The tide is turning in the United States. We celebrated with Maine, Washington and Maryland on Election Day as same-sex marriage was approved at the ballot box. We watch with fingers crossed as the Supreme Court of the United States decides whether to rule on the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA on November 30th. We pray for luck every May 1st when the results of the U.S. Diversity Lottery are announced.

For six years now, Julie and I have done everything we can to be together, even though U.S. laws keep us apart. We are both retired, and are watching our available funds for airline tickets dwindle. We watch the aging of our parents, and want to spend as much time with them as we can in their elder years.

We continue to hope. We continue to believe that we are human beings, with the same rights, the same dreams and the same feelings as our straight friends and family. We wish to have the pursuit of happiness in our own backyard!

We are America. We are Australia. We are a family.

Are you a same sex binational couple?  Do you have families / friends affected by this issue?  Please contact us at http://bit.ly/O4ICountMeIn if you are interested in sharing your story.

Monday, November 26, 2012

Our Story: Art and Stuart

As we head from Thanksgiving into the December holiday season, GetEQUAL and Out4Immigration are highlighting just a few of the stories of binational same-sex couples and the struggles they encounter daily in order to be together. This is the second in the series, and we’re thankful to both Out4Immigration and to Art and Stuart for sharing this story…

Texas Man Separated From Husband This Holiday Season Due to U.S. Law

Binational Same-Sex Couples to Congress: “Enact LGBT-Inclusive Immigration Reform!”


I am a music teacher in San Antonio, Texas, and have spent much of my life developing a mastery of the piano, the organ, and the voice.  I also love computers and online social networks, which is where I ultimately met my [now] husband, Stuart Metcalfe(-LeSieur).

Three years ago, I found Facebook — and thus a limitless opportunity to meet all sorts of people from all over the world. I was just coming out as a gay man and found the freedom of Facebook to be an incredibly powerful way to explore my emerging identity. As I waded through new Facebook friends, one in particular caught my attention — Stuart. I watched a video he had posted to Facebook — complete with charming British accent, which I immediately recognized after having been stationed in the United Kingdom while in the military. He was putting himself down for how he looked on camera, and I wrote back to affirm how great the video was — beginning an ongoing conversation of texts, chats, emails, and eventually Skype.

The first time we Skyped, I was so nervous and flustered that the only thing I could manage to get out was, “Hi! I like Monty Python!” Stuart was patient with me, suggesting that I might want to check out some more updated forms of British humor — and thus we began a friendship based in humor and deep conversations about nearly everything under the sun. As I went through a painful divorce that summer, Stuart was one of my biggest emotional supports — and my family soon welcomed him into the fold through Skype sessions of their own.


We continued to navigate our emerging relationship and tried to cobble together the money to see and talk with one another across the distance. I had never thought about the lengths that binational same-sex couples go to in order to be with one another, and the stress that adds to new — and even seasoned — relationships. We finally uttered the “L” word to one another — declaring our love even as Stuart was traveling in Egypt and I was in South Texas. When Stuart visited me in San Antonio soon thereafter, I dropped to one knee and asked him to marry me. He said yes, and we spent the next 19 months trying to figure out how to navigate the process of getting married in the United States and building a life here with my children.

My parents gave their blessing whole-heartedly and we married in my hometown in Massachusetts by a long-time friend of the family. Stuart can only visit the U.S. twice a year for about three weeks at a time, and we have no mechanism for him to move here permanently as long as the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is in place. His visits here require massive overtime work from him in order to afford each trip and to build up vacation days to spend with me. Those visits are met with great anticipation but, even with the joy of his arrival, there is always a looming sadness that the clock is ticking until his departure. Each time I drop him off at the airport, it’s like having my entire being ripped out of my body. Losing my spouse for such long periods of time tears me apart spiritually and emotionally — our home runs so beautifully when our children have two loving fathers physically at home, but I become overwhelmed when I return again to being a single father.

Despite being legally married in the state of Massachusetts, we cannot apply for a spousal visa so that Stuart and I can build a life together here in the United States. No marriage should have to endure this kind of stress and separation simply because of a discriminatory law. We’re simply asking for a chance to be together and to share the same civil rights that our friends, neighbors, and family enjoy. Holidays are especially difficult — it’s hard to decorate the house or enjoy the season when I’m longing for the day I can wake up early on a holiday morning to share a cup of coffee with my husband. Until the day that we truly see equal protection under the law for all, I’m left holding that cold cup of coffee alone — longing for the warm and loving home that my husband and I deserve.


Are you a same sex binational couple?  Do you have families / friends affected by this issue?  Please contact us at http://bit.ly/O4ICountMeIn if you are interested in sharing your story.

Friday, November 16, 2012

Call to Action! Out4Immigration Needs Couples to Speak Up Now!

by Amos Lim

Out4Immigration has always advocated a multi-pronged approach to getting our issues resolved. We have pushed for passage of an Inclusive Comprehensive Immigration Reform, supported the passage of the Uniting American Families Act, the Reuniting Families Act, the repeal of DOMA (Respect for Marriage Act) and supported the removal of the one-year filing deadline for asylum seekers. And most recently, we pushed for an abeyance policy from the Obama administration with regards to green card applications and making sure that LGBT families are included in ICE's Deportation Guidelines (the so-called Morton Memo which was released in June 2011). These recently revised guidelines will now stop the deportation of partners/spouses of same-sex binational couples where the partner/spouse is without lawful status and in removal proceedings.

Our all-volunteer group did this through education, raising awareness, meeting legislators, forming coalitions with allies in the LGBT and immigration communities and circulating petitions on change.org.

Our last petition on change.org "LGBT Binational Couples Must Be Included in ICE Deportation Guidelines", received about 2,000 signatures. I had the opportunity to deliver this, together with stories from same-sex binational couples and photos from our United by Love, Divided by Law Tumblr blog to the White House when I was there for an AAPI conference last July.


The petition signatures, the stories and the photos, together with the letter sent by Democratic House members urging for LGBT inclusion in the ICE Deportation Guidelines, helped push the Obama administration to finally officially include us in DHS' deportation guidelines.


Now that the election is over and President Obama has been re-elected to a second term, the landscape for moving our issue forward seems even more positive. 


We will know by the first week of December if SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) will hear all or any of the DOMA cases. This means that by June 28, 2013, we will know if DOMA is finally ruled unconstitutional and legally married same-sex couples will get federal marriage rights, all 1138 of them (including, of course, the ability of U.S. citizen to sponsor their foreign spouse for a green card!)


In the week since the election, we have also seen both Democrat and Republican leaders coming out vocally in support of Comprehensive Immigration Reform. 
 

President Obama himself said during his Victory Speech and a follow-up press conference that he wants immigration reform in the United States.

It seems from all indications that a Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR) bill will be introduced in January when the new Congress convenes.


So, today, more important than ever, we need to continue the push to ensure that:

  1. We have an inclusive (LGBT-positive) comprehensive immigration reform bill introduced in Congress.
  2. The LGBT community does not “get thrown under the bus” or negotiated away when CIR comes up for a vote in Congress.
  3. We demand that the Obama administration fully adjudicate all green card cases filed by same-sex married couples including full fact-finding, conducting interviews to determine the bona fides of the marital relationships, either by USCIS (in the U.S.) or by Consular officials abroad, and then hold a final decision on abeyance until the Supreme Court has ruled on the constitutionality of DOMA.
  4. We urge the Obama administration to open up the humanitarian parole process to partners/spouses of lesbian and gay Americans, to bring our fellow binational couples back from forced exile and to end the separation of binational couples and LGBT families until DOMA has been resolved by the Supreme Court.
To do this, we will be working with other grassroots organization like GetEQUAL and various LGBT/Immigration organizations to create and raise awareness about this issue. We need to make this a moral issue that Congress needs to fix immediately through legislation. We need to make Congress understand that they cannot push this aside.

GetEQUAL and the DREAMers have waged a very successful campaign of speaking out, telling their stories and not taking NO for an answer! I believe that we can do something similar to their campaign so that we cannot be ignored anymore!


However, to do that, we will need couples to speak up and tell their stories to the media.
Therefore, we are putting out a call to couples who have suffered under DOMA to come forward and speak up. We can work with you to fine-tune your message as you tell your story.  


Please let us know by completing this form (http://bit.ly/O4ICountMeIn). Submit the form and we will get in touch with you very soon. 


Our time is NOW! Stand up and speak out. Many believe we are in the final phases of ending the terrible discrimination we have faced as same-sex binational couples due to unfair immigration laws and DOMA. Join us and be a part of the change.

Monday, August 20, 2012

Why Out4Immigration Supports Deferred Action for DREAMers

by Amos Lim

Last week, the U.S. began offering "deferred action" for undocumented immigrants who came to this country before the age of 16 and are currently under the age of 31. This group, often referred to as DREAMers (as they were the proponents of the DREAM Act legislation that failed to pass Congress in 2010) will now be allowed to apply for "deferred action", which would mean that they can live and work in America without fear of deportation for a period of two years. Out4Immigration has always counted the DREAMers as our allies in our fight for equal immigration rights and the right for the American citizens among us to be able to sponsor our partners for green cards. Some people believe the DREAMers are getting treated better than us, but that is not the point. This is.

The immigration system in the United States is broken. Immigration has always been used politically to stop groups of people from coming in, whether it was the Chinese Exclusion Act in the late 1800s/early 1900s or the Homosexual and/or HIV Travel Ban (yes, there was once a law in this country that banned homosexuals from entering). These past  - and present - exclusionary policies result in ugly rhetoric.  And corporate media, which is frequently lazy, will repeat what is told to them without fact checking.

I'm not an immigration attorney - just someone who has been in this fight for a long time with some sense of knowledge/history; however, I welcome any attorneys to help clarify my points below.
 
THIS IS THE REALITY  

1)  The deferred action that started last week is just that. DEFERRED ACTION. It is an offshoot of the Morton Memo that came out last June and is targeted specifically at the DREAMers. It gives those who grew up here and completed their education here a chance to stay without fear of deportation for TWO YEARS. The primary reason for the administration to do this is that Congress has not acted on this bill. The DREAM Act was a bill introduced by Sen. Orrin Hatch (yes, that Orrin Hatch) and supported by Sen. John McCain and was once popular among both Democrats and Republicans; it is now out of favor with the Republicans after the last Congress was elected.

It DOES NOT give them a legal route to citizenship, it just gives them some peace for two years while hopefully Congress can pass a comprehensive immigration reform bill or the DREAM Act. It will not "clog up" the waiting period for green card applications or contribute to the current backlog.

The authorization to work that will be provided to this group is not a H1-B visa. According to the FAQ by the Immigration Policy Center (I encourage people to read it, it is very informative): 

"Can a person who is granted deferred action work legally in the U.S.?
>Yes. Under existing regulations, individuals with deferred action may receive an Employment Authorization Document (EAD). Individuals who wish to request an extension of deferred action after two years will also have to apply for a renewal of their EAD."
A job authorization is not the same as an H1-B visa. An OPT visa is a job authorization document, which lasts one year for foreigners who graduated from a U.S. college and it gets processed within 45 days (when I did it 6 years ago), so please do not confuse EAD with H1-B. H1-B is an EAD but an EAD is not a H1-B.

The deferred action is not an amnesty - it gives the DREAMers 2 more years to stay here and work here while Congress gets their act together.

What happens at the end of the two years? Who knows? The next administration might not want to renew the deferred action policy or Congress might finally get their act together and pass a bill. According to the FAQ again by IPC:
"How long does deferred action last?"
>Under the childhood arrivals initiative, deferred action will be granted for a two-year period, after which recipients may request a renewal. According to DHS, individuals will be eligible for future renewals of deferred action so long as they were under age 31 on June 15, 2012.
In contrast: the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has confirmed numerous times that LGBT couples (and the Morton Memo applies) are considered families through various requests from the media but as of this date, they have not actually put it in writing, so we are still beholden on the individual prosecutorial discretions of individual cases. The House Democrats (about 85 of them including Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi) also sent a letter to the DHS urging for a clearer language. Rather than putting this in writing, DHS instead confirmed it to journalist Chris Geidner of Buzzfeed that LGBT couples are indeed considered families and will be entitled to deferred action when it comes to deportations.

In our last petition on Change.org, we asked President Obama to do the same for same-sex binational couples: http://www.change.org/

petitions/president-of-the-
united-states-issue-a-memorandum-to-grant-immigration-rights-to-lgbt-americans

I actually delivered about 1,200 signatures on this petition to the White House's point person on Immigration, Felicia Escobar last month in Washington DC. The petition as of today has about 1,400 signatures.

Had the deferred action been applied to us and not the DREAMers, would we feel differently?  

The argument from conservatives and anti-immigration groups is to frame/depict this and everything immigration-related as "amnesty" or "stealing jobs" or "freeloaders" and we must be careful not to repeat that divisive rhetoric. Because when it comes to us, they like to frame our issue as "fraud", "marriage of convenience", "stealing jobs", "government sanctioning of a immoral lifestyle" etc. etc. etc....

One thing of note: The last time something akin to an amnesty was done was in the 1980s by a Republican president and that was probably the last time we have had any amnesty action.

2)  BACKLOGS
There are many reasons why there are backlogs.  Yes, it is about resources but at the same time it is also about quotas.

Every country has a quota. Congress sets/determines every year how many people from each country can immigrate here (that quota system has not been changed for a long time). Congress also sets the quota based on the visa that you are applying for, whether it is under Family Visa, Work Visa, Green Card based on work etc. So, even if you are approved for a green card based on work or familial relationship, you will still have to wait for your "number" to be called. There have been cases where a green card application is approved but the waiting time for the green card can be at least a decade. There have been numerous bills and numerous organizations that have urged Congress to review the country quota over the years (as it is dated and the rationale for the quota needs to be reviewed) but to no avail. There is also the problem that some countries like Singapore (where I am from) do not usually meet the quota, i.e., less people want
to move here than what was allocated for but instead of using those unused quota "openings" for other countries that need them, they simply expire.

And don't get me going about the quotas for H1-B visas...we all know that the quotas are not enough!
 
Rep. Mike Honda has introduced a bill for the last three sessions of Congress called the "Reuniting Families Act" (RFA). The bill, if passed, will do a couple of things. 1) Pass UAFA (the language of UAFA is included in the bill; (2) reduce the backlogs - the bill will transfer the "unused" visas and transfer them to other categories/countries that have met their quotas; and (3) allow for Filipino veterans who fought in WWII (yes WWII !!!) to finally get their green card and citizenship. This is just a small sampling of what the bill will do; there are many more actions.

As a point of note, during the first and only hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Immigration about UAFA held by Sen. Patrick Leahy in June 2010, there was a conservative immigration group that testified against the passage of UAFA. One of the primary reasons that they gave was that "to allow LGBT couples to immigrate will further clog the badly backlogged immigration process...we need to prevent more people coming in as opposed to letting more people come in." (I am paraphrasing of course and if you want to find footage of that hearing, I am sure you can Google it or find it on the Congressional website.)
 
3) WHY IS OUT4IMMIGRATION SUPPORTING THIS ISSUE?
The answer is pretty simple - Why not?

There are more than 40,000 same-sex binational couples affected by this issue in this country. 40,000 couples. I am not even counting those that are in exile or living apart.

Are our situations all the same? Hell no! Some of us have partners who are undocumented, some of us have partners who are here on a student visa, some of us have partners who are here on a work visa, some of us have partners who visit us once every year for 3 weeks and some of us have partners who are unable to even get a passport to leave the country they reside in to come here. Our situations are all different and there are many solutions to our problems. Until the discriminatory DOMA is repealed or UAFA is finally passed, any solution that will let my brothers and sisters in these situations find some path to remaining in the U.S. legally will be supported by O4I.

Further, as a matter of political strategy we must be mindful that we CANNOT endeavor to fight this alone. By definition, we are a relatively small group of people. We NEED the help and support of anyone and everyone. When we support inclusiveness and fairness in reforms and relief measures, we are more likely to be included. If we do NOT support inclusiveness and fairness for others, we CANNOT expect any support - in fact it would likely be denied.

Please do understand that at the end of the day, we are an all-volunteer grassroots organization. We are not the behemoth that is HRC or any other big LGBT organization that people seem to think we are. The work that you see done by O4I is the work of a few dedicated volunteers who want to see the laws changed. We will take any solution we can get to bring us closer to that change. We support UAFA, RFA, RMA (Respect for Marriage Act), DREAM Act, Inclusive CIR (Comprehensive Immigration Reform) - anything that would create momentum and move us forward and give us a solution to allow us to be with the one we love.

4) WHY IS DEFERRED ACTION AN LGBT ISSUE?
Because it is a civil rights, human rights issue. Are LGBT rights a civil rights and human rights issue? You bet they are! If you have been following the news, you would know that NOM, the National Organization for Marriage, has a strategy that they put forth a couple of years ago to divide and conquer - to pit ethnic groups against LGBT groups and to have them come out and say that marriage equality is not a civil rights issue because well, they cannot change their skin color but we can change our sexuality. And like it or not, the same strategy is still being used to separate us as opposed to uniting us. If we don't support issues that are in our favor because it is not specifically an LGBT issue, why should our allies and straight people support LGBT issues because it is not about them?

Personally for me, being documented or undocumented is a very thin line. If you are on a H1-B visa and got pink slipped tomorrow, you have 10 days to pack up and leave the country or 60 days to find a job and get another H1-B visa.  (Something like this happened to me just after 9/11.) If you have a spouse here and perhaps a kid... maybe you are fortunate to buy a house when the economy is good...what's your choice? Do you just pack up and leave or do you try to find ways to stay? Becoming undocumented means you cannot leave the U.S. at all if your parents fall ill or, God forbid, pass away. Becoming undocumented means you have to live your life in the shadows just so you can stay here to be with your husband, wife or partner or kids. Becoming undocumented means you have to stay silent and not make noise or someone might report you. It is not a life anyone would choose but the broken system (and in our case, our discriminatory laws) often force this choice.

The DREAMers however did not have a choice. Most of them were brought here by their parents or families when they were young. Most of them do not have family ties back home.I have met families where two siblings are Americans and one is undocumented. I met the Pulitzer Prize winner, Jose Antonio Vargas, who is gay and undocumented and many other DREAMers who are gay and undocumented, too. Their stories mirror our own tragic tales.

Deferred action might not be a solution for some of you, but it is a solution for some of us in this community in this struggle. This might mean that for the next two years, someone can work legally without fear and work tirelessly to change the laws for all of us. For that I celebrate the relief it provides for the short time that it does.

That said, this election is also pretty important because we need to carefully examine who are the people who are supporting our issue and who are the people who want us gone. At Out4Immigration, we are not allowed to endorse any candidates so it is important for all of you to go find information about the candidates in your district and where they stand on the issues of the repealing DOMA (Respect for Marriage Act, or RMA), the passage of UAFA, RFA, Inclusive CIR, ENDA and marriage equality.

I hope I have addressed some issues that have been percolating among some of you over the past couple of days. I just want to leave you with a quote that I saw recently that I love from Mr. Nelson Mandela:
"For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains,but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others." - Nelson Mandela.